Student Essay Insanity #64!
Will you still love S.E.I.
When it's 64?
All bad Beatles references aside, it's time for more Student Essay Insanity! This week's picks of the
Each blooper is from a different author and paper, unless otherwise noted. YES, they are ALL final drafts. I couldn't make this up. And, as always, it's all for real: real students, real essays, real(ly) bad.
I shit you not.
**********
- When talking about rock 'n roll or any other of the aforementioned genres, the first ideal that has been crammed into humans' mind is the sudden impulse to question the references that each song makes. Forget enjoying music for the sheer pleasure; rather, dissect it, skewing the lyrics in a way that makes them seem bad in a far-off context. Albeit there are songs with noticeable sexual and mature references, they will be explored later.
- The phrase "child abuse," is something that one may find hard to define because the definitions have expanded over the years. Since 1964, when the first child abuse reporting law was written, most of us have not taken child abuse seriously. ... [Author and book title] have touched the heart of many people and brought awareness of child abuse to our attention. This is an aspiring book that shows determination through a little boy's eyes. ...As a young child only his dreams barely kept him alive and motivated to go on and fight stronger.
- The Spanish Civil War began as a fight for change, as civil wars tend to do.
- There are many relationships that tend to exist in today's society.
- The narrator had strong view points and talked to the girl straight forward. In the text, the narrator gave the girl a list of chores for the entire week and also gave her lessons on how to act in different situations. The narrator also continued to warn the girl that if she did not follow her directions and advice, the girl will grow up to be a slut. At this time, women were still under men's controls.
Labels: All Things Professorial, Student Essay Insanity, Teaching, Writing


2 Comments:
I believe the essayist is not that far off. Certainly, he misses the implication that the narrator is most likely the girl's mother, but when the student is faced with such a monumental pile of horse-puckey as a Kincaid short, minor oversights can be forgiven.
As for purpose and meaning of _Girl_ -- for the sake of discussion, we shall assume that the story has them -- it is unclear to me what they might be, beyond a simplistic "Waaah, mom had a hard life, and now she presses me into the same mold. Waaah!"
Most happily, the University of Google is never far, and I count myself fortunate to have stumbled upon _Jamaica Kincaid's "Girl": A Marxist Reading_ at http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/Virtualit/fiction/criticaldefine/marxessay.pdf, which educated me as to the perpetuation of nameless, identical, robot-like, interchangeable means of production called "women."
In its way, that essay is as bad as the drivel pervading academia: "[...] monologue from a mother to a daughter on how to perform her gender within the narrow paradigm of submissive heteronormativity." Of course, the "narrow paradigm of submissive heteronormativity" -- now it all becomes clear to me!
That last quote came from a discussion of a "performativity" of _Girl_ at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/5/6/6/8/p256685_index.html, in which the daughter suddenly rebels. I must have missed the outright rebellion in the daughter's two interjections; does that make me a bad marxist, or a lousy feminist?
But I digress: Kincaid shows no command of language whatsoever and uses the lack to express thoughts of next to no significance. I believe your student did as well as can be expected with source materiel as anaemic, as devoid of meaning, as Kincaid's _Girl_.
Yours faithfully,
Felix Kasza.
Wow, I felt the urge to hold my hand up to my eyes, in order to shield them from the horrors of bad writing!
Oh, and I appreciate the Beatles reference. :)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home